<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kizune.com/google-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kizune.com/google-patents/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LoudTalk</title>
		<link>http://www.kizune.com/google-patents/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>LoudTalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kizune.com/2006/12/15/google-patents/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>There's nothing new in the patent search industry. The US patents office itself has a great and precise search engine to allow users to make DB searches on all registered patents in the US.

I don't think there's anything special in this, the only difference is the UI. But people doing such in-depth form of searching wouldn't be concerned on search UI as many have grown to accept the US Patent Office's UI for a long time.

Just my two cents!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing new in the patent search industry. The US patents office itself has a great and precise search engine to allow users to make DB searches on all registered patents in the US.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything special in this, the only difference is the UI. But people doing such in-depth form of searching wouldn&#8217;t be concerned on search UI as many have grown to accept the US Patent Office&#8217;s UI for a long time.</p>
<p>Just my two cents!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
